IL SIG. BRIAN WANSINK
Chi è costui? Scommetto che non lo conoscete… Una bravissima persona!
Come direttore dell’ente che emanava le linee guida dietetiche USA del 2010, Brian Wansink – in perfetto stile Ancel Keys – consentì dati associativi deboli. Recentemente Wansink ha dovuto ritirare 15 paper scientifici pubblicati e ha dovuto dimettersi da Cornell, un importante centro per la salute pubblica in USA.
In pratica un’altra mela marcia che propone diete vegetali a base granaglie che hanno rovinato e rovineranno la salute di milioni e milioni di persone…
Ora vi faccio venire i brividi…
Basta aprire Wikipedia dove il nostro eroe ha una pagina dedicata…
Ecco il “parco” elenco dei paper scientifici ritirati, tra cui spiccano i famosissimi PIZZA PAPERS…
Definiti dal New York Magazine
“INCREDIBILMENTE NON PROFESSIONALI”.
Retractions and corrections
Panel from a 2011, in which scientists look for relationships between many colors of jelly beans and acne, and find a p value <0.05 only for green ones.
Cited in New York Magazine piece about Wansink lab’s p hacking.
In January 2017, the validity of research from Wansink’s labs was called into question by Jordan Anaya, Nicholas J L Brown, and Tim van der Zee, after Wansink had written a blog post about asking a graduate student to “salvage” conclusions from a study which had null results, subsequently producing five papers from it, all published with Wansink as co-author. Van der Zee, Anaya, and Brown analysed four of the five papers (referred to as “the pizza papers”), and found conclusions not supported by the data presented, and a total of 150 questionable numbers, such as impossible values, incorrect ANOVA results, and dubious p-values. According to the critics, requests for access to the original data were denied by Wansink, who cited privacy issues over the anonymity of the participants. A February 2017 article in New York Magazine described the pizza papers as
“shockingly unprofessional” and expressed concern over the journals that published them.
In response, Wansink announced an in-depth review of the four disputed papers, after locating some of the original datasets, and published a detailed response in March 2017. A few days later, Cornell released a statement confirming that the university administration had conducted a preliminary investigation of Wansink’s four pizza papers, and had not found evidence of scientific misconduct. The investigation did find multiple cases of self-plagiarism and confirmed “numerous instances of inappropriate data handling and statistical analysis”, requiring Wansink to hire independent, external statistical experts to check and reanalyze his own review of the papers.
Further corrections and retractions follow
Later in 2017, Anaya and his colleagues found errors in six other papers published by members of the Cornell Food and Brand Lab. As of December 2017, six papers had been retracted and 14 corrections had been issued.
By March 2018, two more papers had been retracted and an additional correction made, bringing the totals to 7 (one of them retracted twice, so technically 8) and 15, respectively. In April 2018, JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) issued a “Notice of Expression of Concern” about all six articles authored by Wansink in JAMA and JAMA network specialty journals, to alert the scientific community of concerns about the validity of Wansink’s research; the notice included a request for Cornell to have the validity of the papers independently assessed. In September 2018 JAMA retracted six papers by Wansink.
The following papers were retracted:
Hanks, AS; Just, DR; Wansink, B (July 2013). “Preordering school lunch encourages better food choices by children”. JAMA Pediatrics. 167 (7): 673–4. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.82. PMID 23645188.
Siğirci, Ozge; Rockmore, Marc; Wansink, Brian (6 September 2016). “How Traumatic Violence Permanently Changes Shopping Behavior”. Frontiers in Psychology. 7: 1298. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01298. PMC 5012201. PMID 27656152.
“Retraction note: How Traumatic Violence Permanently Changes Shopping Behavior”. Frontiers in Psychology. 8: 2140. 27 November 2017. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02140. PMC 5712176. PMID 29204134.
Siğirci, Özge; Wansink, Brian (19 November 2015). “RETRACTED ARTICLE: Low prices and high regret: how pricing influences regret at all-you-can-eat buffets”. BMC Nutrition. 1 (1). doi:10.1186/s40795-015-0030-x.
Siğirci, Özge; Wansink, Brian (15 September 2017). “Retraction Note: Low prices and high regret: how pricing influences regret at all-you-can-eat buffets”. BMC Nutrition. 3 (1). doi:10.1186/s40795-017-0195-6.
Tal, A; Wansink, B (24 June 2013). “Fattening fasting: hungry grocery shoppers buy more calories, not more food”. JAMA Internal Medicine. 173 (12): 1146–8. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.650. PMID 23649173.
Tal, A; Zuckerman, S; Wansink, B (November 2014). “Watch what you eat: action-related television content increases food intake”. JAMA Internal Medicine. 174 (11): 1842–3. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.4098. PMID 25179157.
Vuorinen, Anna-Leena; Strahilevitz, Michal Ann; Wansink, Brian; Safer, Debra L. (March 2017). “Withdrawn: Shifts in the Enjoyment of Healthy and Unhealthy Behaviors Affect Short- and Long-Term Postbariatric Weight Loss”. Bariatric Surgical Practice and Patient Care. 12 (1): 35–42. doi:10.1089/bari.2016.0036. (Withdrawn March 2018)
Wansink, Brian; Bascoul, Ganaël; Chen, Gary T. (2006-07-01). “RETRACTED: The sweet tooth hypothesis: How fruit consumption relates to snack consumption”. Appetite. 47 (1): 107–110. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2005.07.011. ISSN 0195-6663. PMID 16574275.
Wansink, Brian; Chandon, Pierre (2006-09-05). “Meal Size, Not Body Size, Explains Errors in Estimating the Calorie Content of Meals”. Annals of Internal Medicine. 145 (5): 326. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-145-5-200609050-00005. ISSN 0003-4819.
Wansink, B; Cheney, MM (13 April 2005). “Super Bowls: serving bowl size and food consumption”. JAMA. 293 (14): 1727–8. doi:10.1001/jama.293.14.1727. PMID 15827310.
Wansink, Brian; Van Ittersum, Koert; Werle, Carolina (2009-06-01). “RETRACTED: How negative experiences shape long-term food preferences. Fifty years from the World War II combat front”. Appetite. 52 (3): 750–752. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2009.01.001. ISSN 0195-6663.
Wansink, B; Payne, C; Werle, C (October 2008). “Consequences of belonging to the “clean plate club””. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. 162 (10): 994–5. doi:10.1001/archpedi.162.10.994. PMID 18838655.
Wansink, Brian; Payne, Collin R. (2009-02-17). “The Joy of Cooking Too Much: 70 Years of Calorie Increases in Classic Recipes”. Annals of Internal Medicine. 150 (4): 291–2. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-150-4-200902170-00028. ISSN 0003-4819. PMID 19221391.
Wansink, B; Tal, A; Shimizu, M (25 June 2012). “First foods most: after 18-hour fast, people drawn to starches first and vegetables last”. Archives of Internal Medicine. 172 (12): 961–3. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1278. PMID 22732752.
Wansink, Brian; Just, David R.; Payne, Collin R. (1 October 2012). “Can Branding Improve School Lunches?”. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. 166 (10): 967. doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.999. PMID 22911396. (retracted and republished then retracted again)
Wansink, Brian; Just, David R.; Payne, Collin R. (21 September 2017). “Notice of Retraction and Replacement. Wansink B, Just DR, Payne CR. Can Branding Improve School Lunches? 2012;166(10):967-968. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.999”. JAMA Pediatrics. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.3136.
Wansink, Brian; Just, David R.; Payne, Collin R. (1 December 2017). “Notice of Retraction. Wansink B, Just DR, Payne CR. Can Branding Improve School Lunches? 2012;166(10):967-968”. JAMA Pediatrics. 171 (12): 1230. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.4603. PMID 29053760.
Wansink, Brian; Just, David R.; Payne, Collin R.; Klinger, Matthew Z. (October 2012). “RETRACTED: Attractive names sustain increased vegetable intake in schools”. Preventive Medicine. 55 (4): 330–332. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.07.012. PMID 22846502.
Wansink, Brian; Park, Se-Bum (November 2002). “Retracted: Sensory Suggestiveness and Labeling: Do Soy Labels Bias Taste?”. Journal of Sensory Studies. 17 (5): 483–491. doi:10.1111/j.1745-459X.2002.tb00360.x.
“Retraction Statement: ‘Sensory suggestiveness and labeling: Do soy labels bias taste?’ by B. Wansink and S.-B. Park”. Journal of Sensory Studies. 32 (2): e12259. April 2017. doi:10.1111/joss.12259.
Wansink, Brian; Westgren, Randall (December 2003). “RETRACTED: Profiling taste-motivated segments”. Appetite. 41 (3): 323–327. doi:10.1016/S0195-6663(03)00120-X.
Capite cari amici lettori? Noi siamo nelle mani di queste persone senza scrupoli… Le stesse persone che stanno iniziando a perseguitare molti di noi con denunce e segnalazioni e cose sempre più violente.
Ma non ci lasceremo intimidire…
E poi ci sono quelli che: MA TU NON SEI MEDICO!!!! PAZZESCO… Che molti di voi quando questi signori parlano in TV, ci credono pure a quello che dicono…
Fare da soli, comprare i miei/nostri due libri che vi spiegano come fare in modo chiaro ed ultra-semplificato…