Shocking: Of 29 pregnant women who underwent the injection for COVID (Pfizer) only one gave birth to a live baby!
The United States Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA) had taken 75 years to release documents that examined the investigational drug Pfizer before issuing emergency use authorization for the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b mRNA "vaccine" ( Comirnaty) against the never isolated SARS-CoV-2 "virus", which can cause the disease called COVID-19.
However, a judge overturned this decision and issued a court order requiring the documents to be issued in large monthly "installments". Today, a series of absolutely shocking data has been brought to my attention by some posts by doctors and people much more informed and talented than me and I report them for the benefit of my followers and those who wanted to read them in Italy.
They are not new.
They come from a document that was in the data dump released in May of this year. This article I hope is for the sake of "fully informed consent," something that regulatory agencies, public health officials and far too many doctors seem to have abandoned in the past couple of years.
I had already dealt with the subject seriously:
Too many people have decided to "get vaccinated" on the basis of pseudo-science, erroneous study data, misinformation and utter disinformation propagated by doctors and public health officials, many of whom are not qualified to comment on anything in the field of "vaccinology", science totally to be rewritten.
The highest quality data for evaluating a new medical product comes from clinical studies. This is because these types of human experiments are typically well controlled and include what is known as "active monitoring"; there is a follow-up to evaluate safety and efficacy. For this reason, the phases of clinical trials should never be compromised or manipulated. With that in mind, let's explore an extraordinary set of data Pfizer has provided to the US-FDA. Here is the related document ...
The data in this document was accumulated through February 28, 2021. Specifically, on page 9, the safety concerns based on the US Pharmacovigilance Plan included “missing information” on “Use in Pregnancy and Lactation”. And already this ...
Do you remember the various Zaia and other politicians who invited pregnant women to make the experimental drug because it was considered "safe" and that even newborns would pass "immunity"? Really sickening ...
The data accumulated up to the end of February 2021 came from too small a sample size (i.e., of pregnant or lactating women) to justify its use in these populations. However, here is the data that was available at the time regarding outcomes in pregnant women who had received Pfizer's COVID-19 inoculation; this is quoted from the beginning of table 6 (the most important points in italics and / or bold) ...
Cases of pregnancy: 274 cases including:
• 270 mother cases and 4 fetus / newborn cases representing 270 unique pregnancies (the 4 fetus / newborn cases were linked to 3 maternal cases; 1 maternal case concerned twins).
• Outcomes for 270 pregnancies were reported come miscarriage (23), pending outcome (5), premature birth with neonatal death, miscarriage with intrauterine death (2 each), miscarriage with neonatal death and normal outcome (1 each). No results were provided for 238 pregnancies (note that 2 different outcomes were reported for each twin and both were counted).
Apparently, the results will never be known for 88% (238/270) of pregnancies. Incredible…
NutriTruth has a great chart on their website summarizing the results of cases for which follow-up data was available ...
It appears that data would be available for five of the pregnancies, but these results were still unknown at the time of writing the Pfizer paper. Therefore, solid data on 29 pregnancies are available. One in 29 of these pregnancies had a "normal" outcome.
This means that 28 of the 29 children have died!
That is, there was a 97% mortality rate!
I don't care which reliable dataset you look at to determine a "background" mortality rate, none of these come close to 97%. Miscarriages are more common than many people appreciate, but again, they're nowhere near the rate in this study. Even in the case of the "normal result", this means that there was an apparently healthy baby. However, one cannot be certain that the result was "normal" until the child has had all of his physiological "systems" fully mature, which means early adulthood.
Pfizer's preclinical reproductive toxicity data is also fatally flawed. The problems included "vaccinating" only the females; apparently he had forgotten that "it takes two people to tango".
You will understand for yourself that from these studies, drugs in the "real world" should never have been authorized based on the data presented here.
Many countries have pushed Pfizer's COVID-19 "vaccine" on pregnant women, often through compulsion or coercion. This was done with the full blessing of the Professional Orders of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
But the question is, will obstetricians and gynecologists continue to make these recommendations with this data in hand?
Definitely yes, for fear of being disbarred ...
So what remains to be done? Couples experiencing or wishing to become pregnant must take responsibility for studying and realizing for themselves before signing any "informed" consent, otherwise they will never be "informed".
Too many obstetricians and gynecologists are either too superficially trained in the immunological subdiscipline of vaccinology or are too afraid to contradict a narrative for which dissent is heavily punished. Some doctors are starting to talk about it. Unfortunately, their singular personal observations are simply considered anecdotal.
REPORT ALL ADVERSE EFFECTS AND BREAK THE BALES TO YOUR PRINCIPAL DOCTOR TO COMMUNICATE THEM
A 97% mortality rate among babies of pregnant mothers who have been "vaccinated" is frightening. And this came from Pfizer's clinical trial data which apparently preferred to ignore it in an evidently CRIMINAL way. This again suggests as reported over and over by this blog over the past 10 years, a massive breakdown / fraud in the health regulation process.
We citizens must begin to react, first of all by never subjecting ourselves to any experimental injection again and secondly by sending the seats of the next upcoming political elections deserted.
If I were a regulatory scientist evaluating pregnancy outcome data from Pfizer, I would never have advocated the use of "vaccination" in pregnant women. And I would never allow "real world" data from flawed studies to replace real preclinical and clinical studies. Nor would I remain silent on this knowledge. Regulators who know these things best need to start talking.
PIECES OF SHIT!
If you use a drug designed for a "virus" that doesn't even exist and has never been isolated, you can't expect great results ...
FOLLOW US ON OUR TELEGRAM CHANNEL! @ evolutely.it
Daily updates on the fake pandemic!
Do you think these pandemics are real? Do you know it's all a bumblebee? Did you know that viruses are not the cause of the disease? What kind of disease is COVID then? How can we defend ourselves? How is the disease actually transmitted? How do they explain these mysteries?
THE MYTH OF THE CONTAGION you can only find it on Amazon or on our shopping thanks to the courage of the writer who published it for his very small publishing house
The update BREAKING THE SPELL describes very clearly "The control experiment" which demonstrates in an engineering way that there is nothing lethal in the air that if we breathe it we risk being intubated or even dying.
In practice: disinfecting your hands only serves to massacre the natural microbiome of the skin and bombard itself with endocrine disruptors and chemicals, wearing masks is ridiculous (as well as very dangerous for health - CO2 intoxication other than global warming ...), to keep us apart it massacres our psyche, greeting us with an elbow or a fist is abominable. But above all these "Obligations" they are hateful and totally useless and potentially deadly or disabling. At least forget about the children.